My friends over at The Community Roundtable, Rachel Happe and Jim Storer, have just published their 2011 State of Community Management Report. It chronicles best practices and discussions related to the of field community management. The Community Roundtable, a leading resource for community management practitioners, and is based off of conversations with representatives from over 60 different companies within the TheCR Network held over the span of the past year.
TheCR has been an invaluable resource to me in my work with online communities, especially their Community Maturity Model Framework (seen below).
I’d advise anyone who plays a role in an online community effort to download the report for detailed reading. It’s packed full of insight and information on the current state of community management within businesses both big and small. The key findings fall into these four themes:
That said, I’m just scratching the surface of the knowledge and tidbits in the report. Get a copy and you’ll see for yourself!
Approximately a year ago, I published "Dispelling the Youth Myth – Five Useful Facebook Demographic Statistics" on this blog. It’s been one of the most visited posts ever since, so clearly there is a lot of interest in understanding the demographics of the Facebook user population. A year later, Facebook is bigger than ever, now the most visited site on the internet. So, I’ve updated the statistics below, and included some new ones, so that we can all be informed, and dispel any myths about Facebook user demographics. Like the original post, I’m writing this one to help avoid the need for us to explain over and over again, who uses Facebook, and instead direct people to this post. Here is the most recent data on Facebook that you can use to enlighten yourself and others on just who uses Facebook and where they come from.
1) Facebook.com average user figures and facts:
2) Breakdown by country: More than 70% of Facebook users come from outside the United States
Global User Population: 629,982,480
3) Global User Demographics: The global breakdown of users on Facebook by gender and age
4) Breakdown of US users (gender and age):
As the chart above illustrates, the total US Facebook population is made up of millions of people across a range of ages groups. While young adults (18-25) lead the way with a combined ~50 million users (almost double the size from a year ago), the 26-34 group is now well behind with ~29 million users. According to the data from Facebook there a combined ~28 million people over the age of 45 active on Facebook. These are impressive user numbers from an older demographic that continue to grow. It’s important to note that the 55-64 age group is almost the size of the 13-17 group, further evidence that Facebook isn’t limited to "young" people.
A visual look at the US users by age (using data from above):
5) Facebook.com – a top destination site for the majority of online Americans, but some states more so than others.
The most important takeaway from the list above is probably the degree of penetration Facebook has relative to the population of each state. Over 50% for many!
Identifying influencers is an important part of social marketing, and becoming big business for some companies like Klout . Yet, influencer identification and analysis isn’t well understood, or easy to optimize. That’s because no two influence analysis efforts are the same. Like fingerprints or snowflakes, an influence analysis program is unique, specific to the goals and priorities of the organization executing it.
To date, automating influence analysis has relied heavily on quantitative measures (example: like followers/friends, RTs, mentions/replies). While these metrics can be valuable inputs into determining whether or not someone is influential, they aren’t worth much at all without their counterpart, qualitative metrics. If influence is a coin, then the 2 sides are quantitative and qualitative. Focusing purely on quantitative metrics tells you if someone is popular, not influential.
A recent and fitting example of this is the news of celebrity Charlie Sheen joining Twitter. Sheen amassed 1 million followers in approximately 24 hours. An impressive feat, no? Is he popular? Definitely. Is he influential? Well, according to Klout he is. Sheen currently has a Klout score of 88 (higher than most people, including industry thought leaders like Chris Brogan (81), Jason Falls (72), and Brian Clark a.k.a Copy Blogger (73). Does this mean Sheen is more influential than any of those 3? It depends on the topic.
Enter relative influence. Relevance brings the qualitative perspective necessary to complete the influence picture. Without it, you cannot be sure that you have an actionable list of influencers. The 3 individuals mentioned above are respected, trusted voices on topics such as marketing, social media and blogging. If you were to take a simple quantitative approach, and rely on Klout’s score, you could make the argument that Sheen is the more valuable influencer to focus on. Would you take his advice on any of those topics over Brogan, Falls, Clark? Absolutely not! Relative influence should be the focus on influencer analysis. You’re looking for individuals with deep, strong ties to the community on specific topics, not individuals with weak ties to many communities. Don’t confuse popularity with influence, they aren’t the same.
In addition to using automated tools to improve the effectiveness of your quantitative influencer analysis, here are some tips to gain a more robust qualitative view and gain a balanced perspective.
Finally, if you’re interested in a rich, in-depth perspective on influencer analysis, take the time to read this eBook, authored by @chuckhemann and @radian6. It will enlighten you on the finer points of influencer analysis, including specific methods and metrics to consider in yours.