
I’ve been spending quite a bit of time over the past several months thinking about social media monitoring, and the benefits that companies, both large and small, can gain from it. I’ve invested a significant amount of time investigating many of the leading monitoring platforms and tools, and learned there are many nuances to conversation monitoring. I thought others might benefit from my research on this topic. So, I decided to put together a list, not comprehensive but a solid start, of the top social media monitoring tools.
I would also appreciate your help in building on this list. So if you know of additional and worthwhile social media monitoring tools, please contribute to the wiki I have started by submitting additional cases.
If you find the wiki useful, please consider a stumble, bookmark, or digg of this page.
Social Media Monitoring (sometimes called social media listening or conversation monitoring) is widely recognized as one of the first social media best practices. It is the first step in getting to know and understand the behavior and needs of an online audience. Most companies that are engaged in this activity have an internal team or outsource the effort to their agency.
There is no shortage of tools/platforms available to monitor your key terms. Companies like Radian6, Techrigy, Nielsen and Cymphony are quite busy these days rolling out new partnerships and product features, all aimed at providing more meaningful data and better ways to use it. It’s the no-brainer call right? Fire up a tool and plug in some terms, and voila, instant answers.
However, I’ve begun to notice inconsistencies in the data that different social media monitoring tools produce. The dirty little secret or so it seems, is they aren’t all working with the same data sources. For this post, I want to discuss some differences between Radian6 and Techrigy SM2. This is not meant as a criticism of either tool, because I think they are both fantastic at what they do, but rather an attempt to highlight an issue, generate a public conversation around it so that everyone using Radian6 or SM2 can benefit.
Some background: While doing a recent set of searches for a brand using the EXACT same keywords and phrases, without using source filters, the results look different. Take a moment to view the charts below for R6 and SM2 results.


Now, ignoring the fact that both tools have some differences in categories, focus on the main sources of online conversation. Blogs, forums and micromedia (Twitter).
You’ll see a dramatically higher number of blog results for Radian6 compared to SM2 (266 to 91). And for forums, vice versa (SM2 has 396 to Radian6 200).
While I expect to find subtle variations in the results between tools, I DO NOT expect to be put into a position to question which tool is “right” and which is “wrong”. Perhaps that isn’t the way to look at it though. Is the real answer an aggregate of both data sets? If so, how does one easily filter out the unique data versus duplicates?
This may raise additional questions that you need to ask yourself before selecting a monitoring solution.
Which subset, or channel, of social media does a particular tool specialize in?
Does this data mean if you know your audience is spending time on forums, SM2 may be better solution? Perhaps. Perhaps not. I suspect there is more to this than it appears on the surface. Hopefully someone else that is also monitoring can shed some light. With any luck, we can get some folks from both companies to chime in (David Alston, Amber Naslund, Jimmy Rey, Connie Bensen – any takers?)
UPDATED: I’ve been contacted by both Radian6 and Techrigy representatives, and am working with them to identify the source of the problems. After we have resolved the issue and feel confident about the source, I will update again.

When did we, marketers & brands, lose touch with humanity and thus reality?
When did we stop stop putting the needs and concerns of our customers first?
When did we throw common sense out the window?
Perhaps some never have put customers needs first, or maybe they did at one point but lost their way. A lot of the marketing that I see now is still centered around what the company wants consumers to think about, feel, or do/take action on. That worked for a long time (before social technologies leveled the playing field) but just doesn’t cut it anymore. This isn’t news to many marketers (in theory), and yet there are still so many brands and companies that haven’t yet begun to embrace helping customers and prospects instead of trying to get them to listen to the brand message. Your brand message should be:
I’m here to help make it easier for you to work with my brand
I recently presented on this topic at the Midwest Digital Conference because I believe there has never been a better time for brands to change their approach, and realign their efforts with customers expectations. The interuptive messaging of advertising continues to be less effective. Yet so many brands continue to sit on the sidelines, bury their head in the sand, and ignore the alternatives available to them. News Flash:
The problem isn’t going away because you are ignoring it
We’re in a new era. The social marketing era. An era of new expectations for brands, new rules for interacting, and new methods/techniques for reaching customers. One of the best things about this new era is that you don’t have to guess anymore about what your business should focus on. Why not? Listen to your customers and they will tell you what is wrong, what they need yet aren’t getting from you, and what direction to focus on moving forward. A well planned, ongoing listening program will unearth this info for you. No more guessing. No more well-planned focus group projects. The internet is your on-demand focus group, providing real time feedback every day. All you need to do is harness the tools available and be open to hearing what people are saying. Make no mistake about it, customers are talking!
Once the needs are identified, deciding what to do next is easy. Solve customer problems! Build a product they are asking for. If you’re a service provider, then use common sense and be helpful! Social marketing offers a tremendous way to do this. With it, big companies can get smaller, by offering individualized, helpful interactions. Small companies can get bigger, enabling them to increase their reach beyond their physical and/or geographic limits.
If you’re planning a strategy to reach consumers online, consider these tips:
Is any of this groundbreaking? No. In fact, it’s common sense (or should be). Common sense is often one of the trickiest things. My colleague Len Kendall reminded me today how difficult this all can be, with this quote “We know our common sense is right, most of the time we just find it hard to prove it”
Hopefully the path to proving it got a little bit easier with this reminder.